Spot Check: Lakefront Property Values vs Public Access No wonder they needed a study session. Make that two.

Spoiler alert: We got nothin'.

But we learned a lot.

And the ball is rolling.

Oh, and no moratorium on projects in the hopper. (Thought we'd get that out of the way.)

Politics may stop at the water's edge, the Village of Winnetka doesn't. Who knew? Seems not many.

It started with the Winnetka Park District's Lakefront Master Plan. Residents, miffed that the final piece – combining Centennial and Elder beaches – included more private development and fewer protections than originally called for, looked to neighboring communities for guidance. 

Unlike those neighbors, Winnetka had no Lakefront Protection Ordinance. Did it need one? 

According to some residents, who, for years – and on their own dimes – had been building revetments and breakwaters, off-loading sand, and shoring up their bluffs to protect their properties from Mother Nature’s wrath, no. 

According to some residents who saw their views, access, and safety threatened from what they considered the Overreach on the Beach, yes. 

So the Village called it. Two Study Sessions: January 10th, and January 31st. Five hours and 23 minutes of kitchen table, sleeves-rolled-up, right-brain-meets-left-brain free-for-all. An unprocessed, uncensored, unparalleled look at your tax dollars at work.

You got your money's worth.

Permits Up the Whazoo

Want to build on, in, or next to Lake Michigan? You probably need a permit. Want to do it in Winnetka? Five. Yup, five.

The US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), the Illinois Department of Natural Resources), the Metropolitan Water Reclamation Department, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA), and our own Community Developmentand Engineering departments all log in so our shoreline stays a shoreline and our bluffs, bluffs.

For two decades, the Village's logic's been if it's good enough for them, it's good enough for us.

But...well, "they" are engineers.

Unintended Consequences

A couple of years ago, USACE in its haste to help panicked-residents-with-visions-of-houseboats-swimming-in-their-heads save their properties from high tide and Mother Nature, fast-tracked a boatload of permits for shoreline and bluff protection.

Then, a Covid-driven staff crunch cut the public comment period to every five years.

Engineering, check. But its impact on the "health, safety, and welfare" of residents who used the lakefront? Not so much. Actually, not at all. This created what Trustee Dalman terms, a "regulatory gap."

Then this...

The Mother of all Jaw Drops

According to the Village Attorney

“Unlike some of its municipal Lake Michigan neighbors whose corporate boundaries extend only to the water’s edge, the Village’s corporate boundary extends one-half mile into the water of Lake Michigan contiguous to the Village… Within the area…the Village enjoys its municipal authorities, including zoning, building, and general home rule powers, all of which are subject to the same standards and limitations as apply to the application of these powers on land.” 

Gap meet chasm.

A New Look at the Lake

What runs the show on land, runs the show a half mile out. It's in our Charter. Plus, we're Home Rule. Our destiny's in our hands – unless hard-stopped by Fed, State, or regional regs.

Looking at other communities only goes so far. The VC consensus is we've got a lot of what we need to deal with this opportunity-slash-responsibility. We just have to some thinkin' to do.

The Village Attorney will get with the Village Code to see what if anything can and should apply to our new point-five of Waterworld.

The Village Manager will get with Community Development and Engineering to review how and why they do what they do and to try to make good policy from this new reality.

Once it's as draft-ordinance-ready as it can be, the Village Attorney will type it up, hit control save and copy, and hand it off to the VC to discuss, debate, and deliberate. Rewind and reboot until it's ready for Prime Time.

And (hopefully) everybody will put this guy on speed dial: Caleb Barth, coastal engineer with Great Lakes chops. Brought on board to help reality test the science behind Mother Nature's whims, and to make sure any new rules and regs hold water.

Lakeside, bluff, and resident protections with Mother Nature calling the shots? The Village Attorney cautions Prime Time could take some time.

Putting the Public Back into Public Comment

It's tempting. More than one Trustee is looking at the Planned Unit Development Ordinance and its commission of Zoning board and Plan Commissioners who jointly review – in public and with resident input – appropriate projects for compliance with the Village's Master Plan and Zoning codes.

This one's not that easy. Mother Nature has no Master Plan, Municipal Code, or any behavior that looks like it might be compliant with any ordinance. That's why USACE and IDNR cop to making a lot of decisions "in the field."

Too often, one year's decision is another year's "what were you thinking?" Expect resident input to help with that "unintended consequences" thing.

This Sand is Your Sand, this Sand is My Sand

Prez Rintz started this most-interesting-episode with: "We're dealing with some of the most valuable and desirable real estate in the Chicago area” and advised the VC to give “thoughtful consideration of the issues raised by concerned residents, developing a vision for the future of our lakefront, and making sure we don’t impair the property values and fundamental property rights of those fortunate enough to own a little piece of heaven in our community.”

Into water sports? Own a dog? Applewatch beach walker? Care about the environment? Lake access top your move-to-Winnetka checklist? This one's for you, too.

Let the balancing begin.

Five-and-a-half hours in 1000 words? There's so much more.

Read and watch The Game Changer, the Village Attorney's Memo – waterlines, ownerships, and why he gets the Big Bucks.

Session 1 – Background, neighbors' doings, new reality

  • USACE – jurisdiction and how they make their decisions

  • IDNR – same

  • Zoning's playbook – ours and our neighbors'. (Caution: there's a lot here. But it's everything – and we mean everything – other communities are doing, straight from their zoning codes and ordinances. Thank you, Mr. Schoon.)

  • Engineering and environmental playbook and Winnetka's permitting process.

Session 2 – Why we'll miss Trustee Cripe when he terms out, and trustee hash-out

For fun:

USACE/IDNR Joint Application and, if you're that interested, the application instructions.

Bookmarks and sign-ups:

Spot Check: One Winnetka's Dead. Long Live One Winnetka.

On Tuesday, January 17th, the Village Council went thumbs up – albeit with a few reservations – for the property formerly and once again known as One Winnetka. Green light for the four-step process designed to deliver something we can all live with on that corner of Lincoln Avenue and Elm Street.

Source: Village of Winnetka

That One Winnetka

  • 7 stories

  • 71 residential condo/rental units

  • 41,381 sq ft commercial –restaurants and retail

  • 227 parking spaces – 33 above ground, 194 commercial/residential underground (2 levels)

  • Traffic access on Elm and Lincoln

Source: Village of Winnetka

This One Winnetka

  • 4 stories

  • 59 residential rental units

  • 20,936 sq ft commercial – medical and financial

  • 156 parking spaces – 38 above ground, 118 residential underground (1 level)

  • Traffic access on Lincoln only – pedestrian walk-through on Elm.

What’s changed?

  • Rentals not condos

  • Conney’s Pharmacy (the space, not the business) – first in, then out, now in

  • Phototronics (the space but probably not the building) – in

  • Cars entering and exiting on Elm – out. Now all traffic comes and goes from Lincoln

  • Ground floor commercial – retail and restaurants out, medical and financial in

  • Parking – above ground and only single level below ground

  • Room sizes – No 1-beds, no studios. Just 1.5's, 2's, and 2.5's, 1,000-2,000 sq feet. Average,1,426 sq ft

Make it Right, then Make it Better

That was Step Two.

Step Three: Preliminary Plan Review

Preliminary planned development application goes to Planned Development Commission (PDC). Plan and Zoning Board of Review commissioners in the same room at the same time logging in on compliance with the Village’s Master Plan and Zoning ordinances or really good reasons why not.

Then to the Design Review Board for tweaks on materials, finishes, colors. Maybe balconies, windows, awnings. The stuff that makes Winnetka look like Winnetka. 

These are we’re-just-trying-to-keep-you-out-of-trouble meetings. If the developer doesn’t like or can’t do the recs, it takes its chances with the VC. 

No date set yet for this fast-track two-fer, but you can bet the commissioners have been following this and are ready to roll. 

Step Four: Final Plan Review

Back to the VC, hopefully for a few questions and a rubber stamp. 

(Fascinating Fact: The VC that sees it next is not the VC that saw it last month. It's losing trustees Cripe and Swierk, but their replacements – one from the Planned Development Commission and one from the Design Review Board – are more familiar with this long, strange trip than almost anyone else in town.)

If the Council finds the final plan “substantially conforms to the approved preliminary plan,” One Winnetka will be off their plates and on its way to the corner of Lincoln Elm. Eyesore no more. 

ETA? TBD. (But we’re on it.)

Why not just OK the darn thing and be done with it?

The VC was feeling the design and direction. But the project's bigger, taller, and denser than our zoning regs, and wants stuff on first floor that is not permitted by right. It also aims to combine several parcels into a single taxable lot.

The PDC will drill down, and if the deliverables square with the asks, will tee it up for the VC. If the VC agrees, it will – cue words of the day – grant zoning variances, issue special use permits, and OK a plat of consolidation.

(BTW: What’s a Planned Unit Development and why should I care?)

But first...

  • Dalman: Her day job says it's hard to fill smaller units. Suggests sizing up. Thinks the southwest corner needs programming. Wants restrictive covenant for balconies. Webers and wet towels don't float Trustees' boats. 

  • Apatoff: “Encouraged.” Is watchfully waiting on the DRB'd log-in on the west façade. Thinks pedestrian passthrough on Elm has opportunity for energy. Architect with Market Square chops agrees. 

  • Cripe: Likes the height, thinks the design is “thoughtful and considerate of the neighbors…” and trusts the DRB to maintain Winnetka's design standards. 

  • Handler: In the Apatoff camp re: west façade. Another vote for the DRB. Questions the ability of medical and financial offices to deliver the amount of foot traffic the developer promised as part of its quid pros for variances and other permits.  

  • Dearborn: Agrees building fits. Joins the DRB wait-and-see crowd. Feels for the neighbors-to-the-south but as a neighbor himself, trusts the Village to make it good and is looking forward to how the building “lives and breathes.”

  • Swierk: Thinks it's "awesome that you picked up Conney’s," hopes the project's Elm Street frontage coordinates with the Village’s streetscape plan," and loves the architecture. 

  • President Rintz: "Thinking hard about the building because it’s such an important part of our community…” Joins Dalman in southwest (AKA Phototronics) corner underwhelmed-ness. Concerned commercial square footage is too deep, suggests swapping it for parking. Joins Apatoff and Handler in the west side's color and material thing. One more for the DRB.

Not the Village's Land. Not the Village's Plan

It's not the Village's fault this thing is still on the drawing board. The Village Council bent over backward to get That One Winnetka off its plate and onto the corner of Lincoln and Elm, but the then-developers couldn’t get out of their own way. After years of negotiations and extended deadlines, they failed to snag the financing to make it happen. Patience not being a thing with banks.

And its Chances?

This One Winnetka seems to be taking that "Village of Learners" thing seriously. 

  • An architect known for his Winnetka-centric design, former member of the Downtown Master Plan Steering Committee, and Chair of the now-defunct Winnetka Business Community Development Commission (BCDC)?

  • A banker who wants this thing over more than we do?

  • A fast-tracked review process with Commissioners who've been riding this horse from the beginning?

Looking good. Looking good.

Feel like Channeling a Commish?

And just in case you're thinking about one for yourself, here's the PUD Application - and to-dos. And this is the fast track.

And about that long, strange trip. We've been reporting on OW for almost a decade. Backstory here.